<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Group Voir Dire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2007/05/group-voir-dire.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2007/05/group-voir-dire.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gideon</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2007/05/group-voir-dire.html/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Gideon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/?p=86#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the insight! It seems that both have their advantages.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m still concerned that people in group sessions might not express their true feelings in the presence of others. For example, if someone has a strong feeling that anyone who is arrested is guilty, might not reveal that if the person before them has said that they are not guilty and the attorneys have displayed some sort of affirmation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How are the jurors excused? In CT, after the questioning, the juror is asked to leave the room and then the judge and attorneys discuss whether to accept, excuse for cause or use a peremptory. Then the juror is called back in and simply told that they&#039;re either on or off.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That might affect some of the answers of the others too, if it is done in front of everyone else.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I like the individual voire dire because it gives me an opportunity to talk to a person one-on-one and ask as many questions as I like to get a sense of what they think; to delve deeper into some of their responses, creates a more personal feel, as if we were becoming friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the insight! It seems that both have their advantages.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still concerned that people in group sessions might not express their true feelings in the presence of others. For example, if someone has a strong feeling that anyone who is arrested is guilty, might not reveal that if the person before them has said that they are not guilty and the attorneys have displayed some sort of affirmation.</p>
<p>How are the jurors excused? In CT, after the questioning, the juror is asked to leave the room and then the judge and attorneys discuss whether to accept, excuse for cause or use a peremptory. Then the juror is called back in and simply told that they&#8217;re either on or off.</p>
<p>That might affect some of the answers of the others too, if it is done in front of everyone else.</p>
<p>I like the individual voire dire because it gives me an opportunity to talk to a person one-on-one and ask as many questions as I like to get a sense of what they think; to delve deeper into some of their responses, creates a more personal feel, as if we were becoming friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
