Schrödinger’s Jury

Didn\\\'t Like ItLiked It (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Some of the most nerve-wracking times in my life — and, I think, in any trial lawyer’s life — are those moments between the jury’s signal that they have a verdict (here in Houston, two buzzes on the jury room buzzer) and the reading of the verdict. They’re almost surreal moments, in which I know that my client’s future has been decided by six or twelve people but don’t know for sure what the decision is.

In quantum terms, the state of the jury is a superposition of eigenstates: “guilty” or “not guilty.” Not until the first consonant of the verdict — “g” or “n” — is read does the wave function collapse into one of the two states.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you give me permission to use your words in any way I like, including editing them for clarity, brevity, or content, as well as rearranging the words or the letters within them to change their very meaning. Those who engage in anonymous ad hominem attacks are the car-keyers of the internet, and will not be tolerated. If you engage in such attacks, I may edit the post to show your name or to make it appear that you are attacking yourself. Or both. I don't have to let you comment here. Don't do so for blatant marketing purposes; do so only to add to the discussion. Once you click "submit comment" you have given up all interest in your words to me, and have no further interest in your words. You agree never to sue, grieve, or complain to anyone about the use that I make of the letters you have typed. If you even threaten to do so, you agree that you will be held up to eternal public ridicule.