Pistol-Packin’ Prosecutors — An Englishman’s Response

Posted on July 25, 2007
Filed Under Uncategorized |

I wrote here about the new Texas law permitting prosecutors to carry guns to court. An English magistrate picked up on the story here:

The idea of knowingly allowing weapons to be taken into court is stupid enough; but by prosecutors? Most of the CPS [Crown Prosecution Service] I deal with are people I would not trust to feed my goldfish, even if I had any goldfish. If they turn up in my court packing heat - I’m going to look for something - anything - safer to do in my spare time.

The comments are diverting as well.

Technorati Tags: ,

Comments

7 Responses to “Pistol-Packin’ Prosecutors — An Englishman’s Response”

  1. Colin on July 25th, 2007 5:49 pm

    Are the prosecutors going to shoot the defense attorneys? The judges? I’m not saying it wouldn’t be funny, but do we have so little faith in prosecutors?

  2. Mark Bennett on July 25th, 2007 6:03 pm

    I have two concerns:

    1. That a prosecutor (often not the most stable of folks) might go postal; and
    2. That a prosecutor (not trained, as cops are trained, to retain his weapon) might lose his firearm to a bad guy.

  3. Colin on July 25th, 2007 6:36 pm

    so would you have less concern with judges packing heat?

  4. Scott "Trigger Happy" Greenfield on July 25th, 2007 8:01 pm

    I thought everybody down there in Texas wanted to pack heat. Ain’t that the Tejas way? Don’t listen to them Brits. They never understood the manliness of guns anyway.

    Seriously, it just sounds like boys with macho toys. And a lot more clout to them than defense lawyers.

  5. Mark Bennett on July 25th, 2007 10:11 pm

    There’s less danger of a judge losing his gun to a bad guy, but I still don’t like judges packing heat for various reasons, one of which is that some of the worst judges I know do so; another of which is that I would rather have judges who aren’t living in fear (and carrying a gun is a symptom of fear); a third is that it turns the Second Amendment on its ass to allow government officials to carry weapons where citizens can’t.

  6. Gideon on July 26th, 2007 12:20 am

    I pack heat. Serious heat.

  7. Colin on July 26th, 2007 1:46 pm

    so you would propose a system where nobody in court but perhaps the sheriffs would have firearms? And what about out of court? here in baltimore it’s practically impossible to get a concealed carry license, but if you’re a judge or [I think] a prosecutor they basically offer you one along with your job. Do you disagree with this? Would your disagreement melt away if everyone (except perhaps convicted felons) were armed?

Leave a Reply