Game Over, Dude

Didn\\\'t Like ItLiked It (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Over at Simple Justice Scott addresses Other Steve’s question of whether he should be a criminal defense lawyer. Scott’s a steely-eyed realist; he doesn’t share the popular delusion that our criminal justice system is a great system; no, the system sucks. And criminal defense lawyers aren’t likely to strike it rich. But still:

We write about fighting the good fight. We sometimes spout the platitudes that bring warmth and comfort to the quiet, huddled masses. We try to give hope. But we know that for all our efforts and persistence, most of the poor unfortunates who fall into the grasp of the law will end up miserable for one reason or another.

So . . . should you become a criminal defense lawyer[?] Absolutely. Not because you’re going to get rich. Not because you will become part of a system that imparts justice and fairness to our society. These are pipe dreams. Myths.

Do it because if you don’t, then the game is over. If young men and women who still believe in doing the right thing for the right reason decide that there is no place for them in the law, then we have lost the war and succumbed to the lowest common denominator in our society.

2 Responses to “Game Over, Dude”

  1. on 16 Nov 2007 at 10:58 pmGlen Graham

    To fight the good fight, to dream the impossible dream, to give some hope, some comfort to the huddled masses. The lawyer doing his job provides protection for civil liberties, the rights of the minority in a democracy. Majority rule, minority rights. To protect the bill of rights and defend the civil rights of us all.

    Sometimes I wonder what kind of society this would be without a lawyer standing up for the bill of rights. Who wants to live in a society without individual rights? They are coming to America! Land of freedom, home of the brave. People still want to know, how can you defend those people? My shortened answer is what kind of society would this be without individual rights and without protection for the individual against the majority? A bill of rights is fundamental. The rights of the minority, property ownership, a man’s castle, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Yours in the Law, Glen R. Graham, Attorney at Law, Tulsa, Oklahoma

  2. on 18 Nov 2007 at 12:50 pmSimon Myerson

    Completely agree Mark. Nothing demonstrates society’s commitment to freedom better than the fact that unpopular people and causes are defended as well as popular ones. It is an honourable estate.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you give me permission to use your words in any way I like, including editing them for clarity, brevity, or content, as well as rearranging the words or the letters within them to change their very meaning. Those who engage in anonymous ad hominem attacks are the car-keyers of the internet, and will not be tolerated. If you engage in such attacks, I may edit the post to show your name or to make it appear that you are attacking yourself. Or both. I don't have to let you comment here. Don't do so for blatant marketing purposes; do so only to add to the discussion. Once you click "submit comment" you have given up all interest in your words to me, and have no further interest in your words. You agree never to sue, grieve, or complain to anyone about the use that I make of the letters you have typed. If you even threaten to do so, you agree that you will be held up to eternal public ridicule.