<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Commerce Clause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Deutsch</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2634</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Deutsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2634</guid>
		<description>Hello Mark,

Putting aside the Straussian hidden meanings, I completely agree with you. The Federal government has abused the Commerce Clause since 1937 (if not sooner) and we have been paying the price ever since.

Interstate commerce means &lt;b&gt;interstate&lt;/b&gt; commerce, not intrastate activities that might conceivably have an effect on interstate commerce.

I&#039;ve learned to stop being shocked at how many Americans feel to realize that - or to even care about interstate commerce. It&#039;s become just a mantra, an &quot;abracadabra&quot; that the Federal government recites before grabbing off yet more power. And I doubt that the &lt;i&gt;Lopez&lt;/i&gt; decision has really changed anything in that regard.

Cheers,

Jeff Deutsch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mark,</p>
<p>Putting aside the Straussian hidden meanings, I completely agree with you. The Federal government has abused the Commerce Clause since 1937 (if not sooner) and we have been paying the price ever since.</p>
<p>Interstate commerce means <b>interstate</b> commerce, not intrastate activities that might conceivably have an effect on interstate commerce.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve learned to stop being shocked at how many Americans feel to realize that &#8211; or to even care about interstate commerce. It&#8217;s become just a mantra, an &#8220;abracadabra&#8221; that the Federal government recites before grabbing off yet more power. And I doubt that the <i>Lopez</i> decision has really changed anything in that regard.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Jeff Deutsch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much. I usually conceal messages acrostically in my blog posts. In fact, the true meaning of my posts is often concealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much. I usually conceal messages acrostically in my blog posts. In fact, the true meaning of my posts is often concealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shg</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>shg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>AHA!  Brilliant.  The first letter of each sentence!

Well done.

callipygian  
Main Entry: cal·li·pyg·ian  
Pronunciation: \?ka-l?-?pi-j(?-)?n\ 
Function: adjective 
Etymology: Greek kallipygos, from kalli- + pyg? buttocks 
Date: circa 1800 

Definition: having a shapely buttocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHA!  Brilliant.  The first letter of each sentence!</p>
<p>Well done.</p>
<p>callipygian<br />
Main Entry: cal·li·pyg·ian<br />
Pronunciation: \?ka-l?-?pi-j(?-)?n\<br />
Function: adjective<br />
Etymology: Greek kallipygos, from kalli- + pyg? buttocks<br />
Date: circa 1800 </p>
<p>Definition: having a shapely buttocks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>David, Ron, I think it&#039;s the nature of government. Living things of all sorts follow (feel?) an imperative to increase their power: animals eat and mate; plants grow toward the sun; governments take away human freedom.

Aha! Gotcha, SHG. Where to put &quot;callipygian&quot;? That&#039;s the puzzle that I had to solve, and now you get to solve it too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, Ron, I think it&#8217;s the nature of government. Living things of all sorts follow (feel?) an imperative to increase their power: animals eat and mate; plants grow toward the sun; governments take away human freedom.</p>
<p>Aha! Gotcha, SHG. Where to put &#8220;callipygian&#8221;? That&#8217;s the puzzle that I had to solve, and now you get to solve it too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron in Houston</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron in Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>It is an interesting phenomena how government just naturally wants to get bigger and expand its power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an interesting phenomena how government just naturally wants to get bigger and expand its power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shg</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2443</link>
		<dc:creator>shg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2443</guid>
		<description>“beyond cavil”  Check
“breed discontent”  Check
“Hamiltonian brilliance”  Check
“six-shooter”  Check
“the commerce clause cannot be read too broadly to satisfy me…”  Check (very imaginative)

“callipygian”  Ahem, do my eyes deceive me?

A wonderful discussion of the commerce clause, and yet, there&#039;s something missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“beyond cavil”  Check<br />
“breed discontent”  Check<br />
“Hamiltonian brilliance”  Check<br />
“six-shooter”  Check<br />
“the commerce clause cannot be read too broadly to satisfy me…”  Check (very imaginative)</p>
<p>“callipygian”  Ahem, do my eyes deceive me?</p>
<p>A wonderful discussion of the commerce clause, and yet, there&#8217;s something missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html/comment-page-1#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2008/04/the-commerce-clause.html#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you brought this up because I&#039;ve been meaning to write about it myself.  One reason I went into criminal defense was my reaction to Justice Breyer&#039;s speech at my law school justifying the federal sentencing guidelines.

He seemed to be saying &quot;give them some time... we&#039;ll work the bugs out&quot; which wasn&#039;t easy to do if you were one of the families caught in their web and doing time under them.  Ironically it was a conservative former prosecutor turned great defense attorney who rebutted Breyer&#039;s arguments so well that inspired a few of us to go into criminal defense.

I rail against the neocons a lot because of the excesses of the Bush administration but also realize that the expansion of federal power in the war on drugs, on crime and now on terrorism, has been a bipartisan effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you brought this up because I&#8217;ve been meaning to write about it myself.  One reason I went into criminal defense was my reaction to Justice Breyer&#8217;s speech at my law school justifying the federal sentencing guidelines.</p>
<p>He seemed to be saying &#8220;give them some time&#8230; we&#8217;ll work the bugs out&#8221; which wasn&#8217;t easy to do if you were one of the families caught in their web and doing time under them.  Ironically it was a conservative former prosecutor turned great defense attorney who rebutted Breyer&#8217;s arguments so well that inspired a few of us to go into criminal defense.</p>
<p>I rail against the neocons a lot because of the excesses of the Bush administration but also realize that the expansion of federal power in the war on drugs, on crime and now on terrorism, has been a bipartisan effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
