Comments on: From the Harris County Sexually Oriented Enterprise Regulations

By: Mark Bennett

Mark Bennett — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:33:31 +0000

Thanks, Brad. This thread is as old as the DB Coopers criminal cases. Let us know what the District Court says.

By: Brad Frye

Brad Frye — Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:34:03 +0000

Well, I get the chance to see what a District Judge (civil) says it means later this week, as we prepare to oppose the County’s Application for Temporary Injunction in the DB Coopers case. Harris County is trying to shut it down, since it doesn’t have a license, and my defense (or, one of them) is in this definition. If a “topless bar” becomes a “bikini bar,” with pasties, I know HCSO won’t like it, but….
And, by the way, Mark, great blog!
Brad Frye
LINDEMAN ALVARADO & FRYE
p.s. Yes, I know this is an old thread, but, Bing brought me here!

By: Mark Bennett

Mark Bennett — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:44:12 +0000

If I opaquely cover two buttocks, I’ve covered more than a human buttock, so I’m not semi-nude, right?

By: JT

JT — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:21:42 +0000

Ambiguity allows law enforcement and the city to prosecute based on their attitudes, and not on letter of the law. Obviously community standards are enforced in matters like these, but wording a law so objectively means that one person will get charged for wearing a shear shirt while another won’t. It’s poor law writing.

By: Leviathan

Leviathan — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:36:38 +0000

Forgive me. In my confusion, I lost count.

By: Leviathan

Leviathan — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:35:28 +0000

Just two questions . . .

All of the references appear to explicitly or implicitly refer to humans (giving an appropriate nod to gender references), except for the anus.

Does this leave room for nonhuman anuses to go bare?

Is “anus” included simply as a metaphor to indicate that fully-clothed people with bad attitudes will now be considered semi-nude?

If it’s not used as a metaphor and people are forced to cover their anuses, could the resultant muffling of some voices be considered an unlawful restriction of free speech?

And, by the way, as the definition appears to refer to only a single buttock or breast, what happened to equal protection? (Note: I purposely am not raising this issue with regard to genitalia.)

By: Windypundit

Windypundit — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:27:24 +0000

It’s the “or” that bothers me. That makes it sound like topless or bottomless—but not both—would qualify as semi-nude, and I don’t think that’s the intent.

By: Tarian

Tarian — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:00:32 +0000

An alternate definition of this, from what I have observed in the lobby and elevators, is: “The preferred attire for women visiting the Harris County Criminal Justice Center.”