Defending People

the art and science of criminal defense trial lawyering

To My Republican Friends

Are you collectively really so brainwashed that you think it’s okay to advocate “empowering” judges by taking sentencing power away from juries in felony cases belongs in the same document (the Texas GOP 2008 Platform . . . the image ought to be a live link) as “Preserving American Freedom” and “Limiting the Expanse of Government Power”?

200807142138.jpg

I’m just askin’. . .

Tags:


This entry was posted by Mark Bennett on Monday, July 14th, 2008 at 8:43 pm and is filed under Republicans eat their weak, jury, politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

About The Author

Mark Bennett
Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

9 Responses to “To My Republican Friends”

  1. DL says:
    14 July 2008 at 9:02 pm

    Hahaha! This is why I love Mark Bennet.

    Reply
  2. AHCL says:
    14 July 2008 at 9:42 pm

    Isn’t Texas only one of two states that still has jury sentencing? As usual, I think Texas is one of the few states that still gets it right.

    I was raised as a Republican and I still have to beat my head against the wall at how much they do to destroy themselves in PR realm.

    Reply
  3. Mark Bennett says:
    14 July 2008 at 9:53 pm

    There are apparently several states that allow the jury to sentence in a felony case. (Here is a law review article on felony jury sentencing. According to the article, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia allow juries to set punishment in felony cases.)

    Like another of my ex-Republican friends told Newsweek, “It’s hard being a member of the mean party.”

    Reply
  4. Alien says:
    14 July 2008 at 10:55 pm

    At least the Truth in Sentencing right above that will let the jury know just how long the judge is gonna stick it to the defendant. I wonder if that Truth in Sentencing applies before or after they have to say guilty or not guilty. Probably after.

    Reply
  5. Ron in Houston says:
    15 July 2008 at 5:56 am

    Well, It’s before 7 and I’ve already gotten an education today.

    I love the quote about being a member of a mean party. That’s priceless.

    Reply
  6. Mark's Dad says:
    16 July 2008 at 11:04 pm

    It strikes me that asking your “friends” if they are collectively brainwashed is notably unfriendly.

    But since you asked, I’ll answer that my Republican friends tend to agree with you that transferring power from juries to judges is inconsistent with “Preserving American Freedom” and “Limiting the Expanse of Government Power.”

    Reply
  7. Mark Bennett says:
    17 July 2008 at 6:53 am

    Sometimes friends need a good talking-to.

    Reply
  8. Tony Vitz says:
    20 July 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Sometimes, they aren’t really friends. Sometimes, they are prosecutors wearing a defense lawyer’s suit of clothes.

    Reply
  9. Brendan Kelly says:
    21 July 2008 at 1:22 pm

    Mark,

    I consider myself an ex-Republican…or perhaps a “Recovering Republican” as the GOP reminds me a great deal of the Officers and Crew of the Lusitania. I generally like what they are trying to do, and I like where they are trying to go. I find myself supporting their efforts, and hope they make it to their destination. That being said, their actions do not give me a whole lot of confidence in their ability to pull it off, and I have grave doubts that they actually will get to where they are trying to go.

    You are absolutely right, letting the Jury rather than the Judge sentence is the better idea, and more in line with preserving Freedom and Liberty. That’s why I find this suprising, as the GOP is generally more upset about “liberal Judges” than anything else. (Not that there are a lot of those left in Texas, but still that’s what get people all outraged, and that’s what the infobabes on Fox tended to scream about…back when I still watched Fox.) I can’t explain it, other than perhaps some party activist made it their pet cause, and forced it into the platform. You are right, it doesn’t really make sense.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you give me permission to use your words in any way I like, including editing them for clarity, brevity, or content, as well as rearranging the words or the letters within them to change their very meaning. Those who engage in anonymous ad hominem attacks are the car-keyers of the internet, and will not be tolerated. If you engage in such attacks, I may edit the post to show your name or to make it appear that you are attacking yourself. Or both. I don't have to let you comment here. Don't do so for blatant marketing purposes; do so only to add to the discussion. Once you click "submit comment" you have given up all interest in your words to me, and have no further interest in your words. You agree never to sue, grieve, or complain to anyone about the use that I make of the letters you have typed. If you even threaten to do so, you agree that you will be held up to eternal public ridicule.

« In Trial*     Trial Psychosis »