<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blawg Reviews 198 and 199</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html/comment-page-1#comment-7020</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html#comment-7020</guid>
		<description>That&#039;ll work.  You can do anything with it.  

Ken and I are thinking about asking to host one of these, but they&#039;re booked so far out that the most likely themes would be the 75th anniversary of Calvin Coolidge&#039;s reelection, or America Recycles Day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;ll work.  You can do anything with it.  </p>
<p>Ken and I are thinking about asking to host one of these, but they&#8217;re booked so far out that the most likely themes would be the 75th anniversary of Calvin Coolidge&#8217;s reelection, or America Recycles Day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html/comment-page-1#comment-7019</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html#comment-7019</guid>
		<description>I was thinking I might use the theme &quot;Valentine&#039;s Day&quot;, which would cover both romance and massacres. 

Broad enough for you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking I might use the theme &#8220;Valentine&#8217;s Day&#8221;, which would cover both romance and massacres. </p>
<p>Broad enough for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html/comment-page-1#comment-7018</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/02/blawg-reviews-198-and-199.html#comment-7018</guid>
		<description>Please Mark, tell me that you&#039;re not going with a theme.  Or if you are, that it will be a theme so broad that you can link to anything, like &quot;the presumption of innocence.&quot;  Every blawgreview has a theme.  Some are great (Randazza&#039;s Bill of Rights Day and Coleman&#039;s Chanukah, recently, come to mind), but most these days seem either to steer toward a niche or to be so contrived that they detract from the writing.

On that note, I think your comments on the criminal lawyer&#039;s understanding of &quot;not guilty&quot; (&quot;prove it&quot;), should go into whatever you produce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please Mark, tell me that you&#8217;re not going with a theme.  Or if you are, that it will be a theme so broad that you can link to anything, like &#8220;the presumption of innocence.&#8221;  Every blawgreview has a theme.  Some are great (Randazza&#8217;s Bill of Rights Day and Coleman&#8217;s Chanukah, recently, come to mind), but most these days seem either to steer toward a niche or to be so contrived that they detract from the writing.</p>
<p>On that note, I think your comments on the criminal lawyer&#8217;s understanding of &#8220;not guilty&#8221; (&#8220;prove it&#8221;), should go into whatever you produce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
