<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peremptories &#8212; Love &#8216;Em or Leave &#8216;Em?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: They Were Practically Begging to Be Struck&#8230; &#8212; Chandler Criminal Defense</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>They Were Practically Begging to Be Struck&#8230; &#8212; Chandler Criminal Defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>[...] of people have been writing about peremptory challenges lately. You can read some interesting posts here and here. In Arizona, the parties each get six peremptory challenges in felony cases not punishable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of people have been writing about peremptory challenges lately. You can read some interesting posts here and here. In Arizona, the parties each get six peremptory challenges in felony cases not punishable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jdog</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>As an outsider, I&#039;m finding this discussion more than moderately interesting.  I think it&#039;s (what passes for) conventional wisdom outside your trade that challenges for cause aren&#039;t particularly difficult to get judges to do that okay-thingee on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an outsider, I&#8217;m finding this discussion more than moderately interesting.  I think it&#8217;s (what passes for) conventional wisdom outside your trade that challenges for cause aren&#8217;t particularly difficult to get judges to do that okay-thingee on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peremptory juror challenges</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-7361</link>
		<dc:creator>Peremptory juror challenges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 13:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html#comment-7361</guid>
		<description>[...] however, take a position sharply different from mine: Patrick and Ken at Popehat, Scott Greenfield, Mark Bennett. (More: WSJ law blog.) Deadline pressure doesn&#8217;t permit me to join in, but anyone interested [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] however, take a position sharply different from mine: Patrick and Ken at Popehat, Scott Greenfield, Mark Bennett. (More: WSJ law blog.) Deadline pressure doesn&#8217;t permit me to join in, but anyone interested [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peremptory Challenges &#8212; The Worst System, Except For All The Other Ones &#124; Popehat</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>Peremptory Challenges &#8212; The Worst System, Except For All The Other Ones &#124; Popehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>[...] about peremptory challenges today, and whether they ought to be ditched or severely curtailed. Mark Bennett has an excellent roundup of posts on the subject, as well as his own hard-learned impre... This discussion crops up every few years as commentators fantasize about a &#8220;truly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about peremptory challenges today, and whether they ought to be ditched or severely curtailed. Mark Bennett has an excellent roundup of posts on the subject, as well as his own hard-learned impre&#8230; This discussion crops up every few years as commentators fantasize about a &#8220;truly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay S. Conrad</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-7353</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay S. Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/03/peremptories-love-em-or-leave-em-2.html#comment-7353</guid>
		<description>I hate to disagree, but I do.

There is no way to take racial bias out of peremptories.  There will always be ways around Batson; hair style, clothing, speech patterns, etc.  Someone, somewhere, will argue that they goit rid of a black juror because he had the same blood type as the Defendant, and therefore will be biased in his favor.  After all the good reasons are gone, people fall back on race.

Secondly, we only need ONE JUROR to prevent a conviction.  How often is that one juror who would never convict on a weed case, but won&#039;t say so, eliminated by the State on a peremptory?  I think that peremptories -- even if the defense uses them better -- eventually benefit the State far more than they do us.  Yes, I&#039;d expect to see more hung juries, and perhaps fewer convictions or acquittals.  I&#039;ll trade some acquittals for hung juries, if the outcome is that the State has to trade some convictions for hung juries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to disagree, but I do.</p>
<p>There is no way to take racial bias out of peremptories.  There will always be ways around Batson; hair style, clothing, speech patterns, etc.  Someone, somewhere, will argue that they goit rid of a black juror because he had the same blood type as the Defendant, and therefore will be biased in his favor.  After all the good reasons are gone, people fall back on race.</p>
<p>Secondly, we only need ONE JUROR to prevent a conviction.  How often is that one juror who would never convict on a weed case, but won&#8217;t say so, eliminated by the State on a peremptory?  I think that peremptories &#8212; even if the defense uses them better &#8212; eventually benefit the State far more than they do us.  Yes, I&#8217;d expect to see more hung juries, and perhaps fewer convictions or acquittals.  I&#8217;ll trade some acquittals for hung juries, if the outcome is that the State has to trade some convictions for hung juries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
