<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Motion to Recuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html</link>
	<description>the tao of criminal defense trial lawyering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html/comment-page-1#comment-11638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html#comment-11638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take &quot;embarrassing moments in Harris County History&quot; for $200, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take &#8220;embarrassing moments in Harris County History&#8221; for $200, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bennett</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html/comment-page-1#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html#comment-11637</guid>
		<description>While that might be true, it&#039;s not what I&#039;m saying. Please try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While that might be true, it&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m saying. Please try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John David Galt</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html/comment-page-1#comment-11634</link>
		<dc:creator>John David Galt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html#comment-11634</guid>
		<description>It sounds as though you are saying that a judge can have a personal bias in favor of a particular criminal defendant, and the state has no right to any remedy.  Is that really what you meant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as though you are saying that a judge can have a personal bias in favor of a particular criminal defendant, and the state has no right to any remedy.  Is that really what you meant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wright</title>
		<link>http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html/comment-page-1#comment-11586</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennettandbennett.com/blog/2009/11/the-motion-to-recuse.html#comment-11586</guid>
		<description>Have you forgotten that the former HarCo DA cited &quot;the rights of States to determine their own destiny&quot; in his SCOTUS oral argument in Lawrence?

If states have substantive due process rights, then it follows that they have procedural due process rights. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you forgotten that the former HarCo DA cited &#8220;the rights of States to determine their own destiny&#8221; in his SCOTUS oral argument in Lawrence?</p>
<p>If states have substantive due process rights, then it follows that they have procedural due process rights. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
