Murray, I am pretty sure Devon Anderson and the fifty other folks no longer working at the DA’s office are not laughing. Give them my best. This is where you decide whether or not I am laughing.

It’s been over five years since the 185th Grand Jury investigated and subsequently cleared Rachel, yet you somehow are tying the murder of pregnant woman to your long-irrelevant journey for revenge. Your impotent rage towards Judge Brown somehow wasn’t enough to sink her reelection in 2014, and to this day we all still laugh about you in the back of courtrooms in the CJC — far many more than just Judge Brown’s.

I highly doubt that you fully comprehend how many people laugh at your “knowledge of the law” coupled with your atrocious spelling and grammar. I’m sure that Rachel really appreciates you pointing out that David Mitcham was her lawyer. I can’t imagine why she wouldn’t want to put her pleading the 5th incident behind her completely. Wasn’t David your lawyer, as well, at a different point? I mean, I’m well familiar with your attraction to carrying a badge and a club, but at the end of the day, your only true experience with the legal system was as a Defendant.

Your legal knowledge is about as legitimate as your “energy trader business” and your “powerful Republican influence.” I would suggest that you return to Big Jolly’s page where you still have two or three reader who seem to find you intellectually stimulating, but then again, people on Mark’s blog shouldn’t be deprived of your meaningless ramblings, I suppose.

I would tell you that people are laughing at you, not with you, but you would never believe me.

So, party on, Don.

[Link was to “promotelaw.com/blog/”. Tagline: “Our Law Firm Promotion Methods Simply ‘Work’..”.

CCP 2.07 says, ” Whenever an attorney for the state is disqualified to act in any case or proceeding, is absent from the county or district, or is otherwise unable to perform the duties of his office, or in any instance where there is no attorney for the state, the judge of the court in which he represents the state may appoint any competent attorney to perform the duties of the office during the absence or disqualification of the attorney for the state.”

Mount and St. Martin may have been appointed in the 185th because Susan Brown is the judge of the 185th.

Because Susan Brown is the Chief Administrative Judge of the criminal courts and appoints the pro-tems. This is how we got Jim Mount and Stephen St. martin appointed in the 185th. I might add, Susan Brown is the very reason Murray Newman wants Kim to recuse herself. I was there when Patricia Pollard, Murray Newman, and Luci Davidson came laughing out of Susan Brown’s chambers in a hearing involving the 185th grand jury. These people are corrupt and gone. Susan Brown is the top of the list the next election cycle. Either the Republicans remove her are we take her out at the ballot box. It is not the trial court Judge who appoints attorney pro-tem. It is Susan Brown.

Why would Judge Brown (instead of Judge Johnson) be responsible for appointing an attorney pro tem on the Temple case if Ogg requested one?

Jim Mount you do realize David Mitcham was Rachel’s lawyer?

Has Kelly Siegler ever been disciplined by the State Bar for her misconduct? Or is this just another prosecutor who cheats, gets caught and nothing happens except for maybe they get a television show?
Robb

I think this morning’s paper said she would be reviewing it herself.