Defending People

the art and science of criminal defense trial lawyering

Chuck May Not Be Out; Kelly May Not Be In

Here’s section 145.001 of the Texas Election Code:

§ 145.001. METHOD FOR WITHDRAWAL AS CANDIDATE. (a) To withdraw from an election, a candidate whose name is to appear on the ballot must request that the candidate’s name be omitted from the ballot.
(b) To be effective, a withdrawal request must:
(1) be in writing and be signed and acknowledged by the candidate; and
(2) be timely filed with the appropriate authority as provided by this code.
(c) A withdrawal request filed by mail is considered to be filed at the time of its receipt by the appropriate authority.
(d) The time of a withdrawal is the time that an effective withdrawal request is filed.
(e) This section does not apply to a candidate for president or vice-president of the United States.

Here’s Chuck Rosenthal’s letter asking the party chairman to withdraw his nomination.

You’ll notice that:

1. It does not request that his name be omitted from the ballot; and

2. It is signed but not acknowledged.

So it would appear that Chuck did not legally withdraw from the election. And if Chuck didn’t legally withdraw from the election, then the filing deadline was not extended beyond yesterday. And if the filing deadline was not extended beyond yesterday, then Kelly Siegler’s attempt to be added to the ballot was untimely.

So, for Harris County DA, it’ll be Jim Leitner vs. Chuck Rosenthal.

You heard it here first (and, to give credit where due I heard it first from überlawyer, election-code guru, and, most importantly, my lawyer: Troy McKinney).


About The Author

Mark Bennett
Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you give me permission to use your words in any way I like, including editing them for clarity, brevity, or content, as well as rearranging the words or the letters within them to change their very meaning. Those who engage in anonymous ad hominem attacks are the car-keyers of the internet, and will not be tolerated. If you engage in such attacks, I may edit the post to show your name or to make it appear that you are attacking yourself. Or both. I don't have to let you comment here. Don't do so for blatant marketing purposes; do so only to add to the discussion. Once you click "submit comment" you have given up all interest in your words to me, and have no further interest in your words. You agree never to sue, grieve, or complain to anyone about the use that I make of the letters you have typed. If you even threaten to do so, you agree that you will be held up to eternal public ridicule.