Defending People

the art and science of criminal defense trial lawyering

Problems With Judge Voir Dire

Notes I wrote during a federal judge’s voir dire a few months ago:

Judge Voir Dire.jpg

A judge’s voir dire is calculated to get jurors to promise to follow the law while a lawyer’s voir dire is calculated to find those who might have difficulty following the law.

A judge’s voir dire is calculated to get jurors to agree with the judge while a lawyer’s voir dire is calculated to find those who disagree.

A judge’s voir dire is calculated to qualify more jurors while a lawyer’s voir dire is calculated to find those who are not qualified.


About The Author

Mark Bennett
Mark Bennett got his letter of marque from the Supreme Court of Texas in May 1995. He is famous for having no sense of humor when it comes to totalitarianism.

Comments

3 Responses to “Problems With Judge Voir Dire”

  1. AHCL says:

    Are tonight’s winning lottery numbers listed on that sheet of paper?

  2. Mark Bennett says:

    Quite likely. When the judge is doing a wholly worthless voir dire, there’s not a whole lot for second-chair counsel to do other than calculate the mean age of the jurors (seven years younger than the panel we busted the day before when the lawyers got voir dire).

  3. anna says:

    My favorite is the judge explaining to the jury that it is against the law for them to take the defendant’s race into account in their deliberations. Then the judge asks them if they can follow that? Is anyone going to say no? Then the judge says the defendant is presumed innocent and comes before them with a clean slate and has not burden to prove his innocence, and the judge asks them if they can follow that rule? Who will say no? Then the prosecution gets to argue in closing that they are to use their common sense in deciding guilty, which common sense tells them that if the police charged the guy, he is guilty, especiallly if he is black.

Leave a Reply

By submitting a comment here you give me permission to use your words in any way I like, including editing them for clarity, brevity, or content, as well as rearranging the words or the letters within them to change their very meaning. Those who engage in anonymous ad hominem attacks are the car-keyers of the internet, and will not be tolerated. If you engage in such attacks, I may edit the post to show your name or to make it appear that you are attacking yourself. Or both. I don't have to let you comment here. Don't do so for blatant marketing purposes; do so only to add to the discussion. Once you click "submit comment" you have given up all interest in your words to me, and have no further interest in your words. You agree never to sue, grieve, or complain to anyone about the use that I make of the letters you have typed. If you even threaten to do so, you agree that you will be held up to eternal public ridicule.