-
.: Recent Posts :.
- Declaration: The Author’s Cut, Restored
- The Declaration of Independence
- Proof that Lawyers Can Survive Without Honor.
- The UCC: Ban it Fully, or Not at All.
- Justice vs. The Law
- Law and Justice Explained.
- Fifteen Books for Becoming a Better Criminal Defense Trial Lawyer
- The Hair in the Food, and Jury Selection
.: They Like Me. They Really Like Me. :.

.:
Dennis Elias’s Latest Tweet :..:
Injustice News Twitter Feed :.- InjusticeNews: Huntington IN police officer suspended for repeatedly browsing for porn on department-owned computers during work: http://u4pmx.tk
- InjusticeNews: Indianapolis IN police sued by man who was wrongfuly arrested on auto theft warrant describing black male, he was white: http://bit.ly/84zs6
- InjusticeNews: San Antonio TX police officer arrested on allegations that he sexually assaulted a woman in a secluded area of the city: http://yrrlr.tk
.:
Skype me. :.

-
.: Subscribe via Email :.
.: Subscribe through Feedburner :.
.: Archives :.
.: Categories :.
.: Recent Comments :.
- Proof that Lawyers Can Survive Without Honor. (3)
- John Kindley: Bravo, Mr. Bennett. There is natural law grounded in natural rights, and then there are government laws...
- simian: “legalistic proscription”?? Since when is keeping atty-client communications privileged merely a...
- The Declaration of Independence (3)
- Tarian: Amen! The power and poetry of those words is awe-inspiring.
- brian tannebaum: It’s amazing what you can write when you put your mind to it
- Ken: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator...
- Fifteen Books for Becoming a Better Criminal Defense Trial Lawyer (4)
- Bob: Thanks for the list. I went out and bought to of them today. I must confess that I fell into the trap early on...
- The UCC: Ban it Fully, or Not at All. (3)
- Gritsforbreakfast: Huh, I thought they’d cleaned up the whole deal about who could apply for UCC liens, etc.,...
- Thomas R. Griffith (The Griffith Files - 1984 & Beyond): What the F____ was all that about? Second thought, I...
- Justice vs. The Law (17)
- John Kindley: Uh, no, I wouldn’t mind if you included “my” motto in your book.
- Thomas R. Griffith (The Griffith Files - 1984 & Beyond): Mr. K., Love your Motto. Would you mind if I included...
- Proof that Lawyers Can Survive Without Honor. (3)
.: Meta :.
Copyright © 2009 Defending People is Proudly Powered by Wordpress. Theme by The Cloisters

An alternate definition of this, from what I have observed in the lobby and elevators, is: “The preferred attire for women visiting the Harris County Criminal Justice Center.”
It’s the “or” that bothers me. That makes it sound like topless or bottomless—but not both—would qualify as semi-nude, and I don’t think that’s the intent.
Just two questions . . .
All of the references appear to explicitly or implicitly refer to humans (giving an appropriate nod to gender references), except for the anus.
Does this leave room for nonhuman anuses to go bare?
Is “anus” included simply as a metaphor to indicate that fully-clothed people with bad attitudes will now be considered semi-nude?
If it’s not used as a metaphor and people are forced to cover their anuses, could the resultant muffling of some voices be considered an unlawful restriction of free speech?
And, by the way, as the definition appears to refer to only a single buttock or breast, what happened to equal protection? (Note: I purposely am not raising this issue with regard to genitalia.)
Forgive me. In my confusion, I lost count.
Ambiguity allows law enforcement and the city to prosecute based on their attitudes, and not on letter of the law. Obviously community standards are enforced in matters like these, but wording a law so objectively means that one person will get charged for wearing a shear shirt while another won’t. It’s poor law writing.
If I opaquely cover two buttocks, I’ve covered more than a human buttock, so I’m not semi-nude, right?