Posted on

 January 26, 2015 in 

A wise man recently said, “If you publicly oppose criminalization of anything, zealots of criminalization will accuse you of favoring that thing.”

The argument is either ignorant or dishonest. Franks doesn’t get to plead ignorance here. She knows the argument is dishonest and she makes it anyway.

It is fair to ask, “is there some depth to which Mary Anne Franks won’t sink?” So far we haven’t found that depth.

Share This Post, Choose Your Platform!

5 Comments

  1. Robert What? January 27, 2015 at 8:45 pm - Reply

    Too true. Just like asking for due process for someone accused of rape is now considered to be sanctioning rape.

  2. […] of gross, but sure.  Definitely poor form.  And for the benefit of the logic-impaired, this does not mean Corey approves of farting in the deceased’s face while […]

  3. andrews January 31, 2015 at 11:16 am - Reply

    “is there some depth to which Mary Anne Franks won’t sink?”

    The evidence is mixed. So far as we know, she has not killed any kittens in promoting her ill-advised revenge porn bill. The problem is that she has not come out against kitten-killing, and so I guess we have to supply the facts via presumption.

    • Mark Bennett January 31, 2015 at 12:35 pm - Reply

      If only she would deny killing kittens.

      • andrews February 1, 2015 at 3:06 pm - Reply

        If she denies killing kittens, then we should probably presume that the reason is she is too busy strangling puppies. I think that is how these things work.

Leave A Comment

Recent Blog Posts

Categories

Archive