Posted on

 November 17, 2013 in 

Here‘s a Motion for Rehearing filed by the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, and here, for your enjoyment, is my response (PDF, if it doesn’t show up inline):

https://blog.bennettandbennett.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Response-to-MRH-Redacted.pdf

Share This Post, Choose Your Platform!

6 Comments

  1. Thomas R. Griffith November 17, 2013 at 1:53 pm - Reply

    Mr. B., regarding the COURT ORDER issued in response to motions (Agreed or Denied).

    If you were to have filed this motion (or, any motion including pre-trial) and later found that the COURT ORDER form was attached to the motion but wasn’t filled out by the court and didn’t contain a time date file stamp, would you have any concerns or place any objections on the record prior to continuing? Or, is this simply business as usual in Harris County? Thanks.

  2. Mark Bennett November 17, 2013 at 1:59 pm - Reply

    Thomas, it’s been almost thirty years. I think it may be time for you to let it go.

  3. Thomas R. Griffith November 17, 2013 at 2:09 pm - Reply

    Mr. B., letting go as we speak.
    Thanks a million.

  4. Mark Lyon November 17, 2013 at 7:59 pm - Reply

    I like the alignment of your section headings. Makes it easy to skim.

    • Mark Bennett November 17, 2013 at 8:23 pm - Reply

      Thanks. That’s gotten mixed reviews. I’ve never heard from a judge one way or another.

    • Dave Bundrick November 18, 2013 at 9:08 am - Reply

      I like it too. Most lawyers are hidebound and reactionary in the matter of typesetting, or (worse yet) don’t think about it at all.

Leave A Comment

Recent Blog Posts

Categories

Archive